Jtm-mn-mpr - Revision history

Bill Densmore at 02:28, 7 June 2008

2008-06-07T02:28:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:28, 7 June 2008
Line 246:		Line 246:

	Julia Opoti -- The Washington Post offered buyouts and the people who took the most were copyeditors. They verify stories and fact check. They have been taken for granted. She has a question: How does news media, how do we journalists or writers make news interesting to viewers. "Because I think that is what the problem is . . . How do we make sure we have something interesting enough that we don't hype a story?"		Julia Opoti -- The Washington Post offered buyouts and the people who took the most were copyeditors. They verify stories and fact check. They have been taken for granted. She has a question: How does news media, how do we journalists or writers make news interesting to viewers. "Because I think that is what the problem is . . . How do we make sure we have something interesting enough that we don't hype a story?"


			Listener: He corresponds with people at major news organizations. Many are willing to engage with you and do back and forth. That's one say for ordinary citizens to engage in a civil and meaingful way. "And I think you will be surprises at the responses you get."


			Griff Wigley: A Strip columnist talks about what is going on in the bloggosphere. He would love it if MPR assigned someone to track the bloggosphere around Minnesota and select those that are of highquality as a way of encouraging those bloggers to do more. It builds civic capacity.

Bill Densmore at 02:26, 7 June 2008

2008-06-07T02:26:24Z

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 Listener: The problem is partisanship has been going up and up -- there is nobody neutral in America anymore -- everyone is partisan. Even if you try to go and listen to the news as a neutral person, someone from the opposite side will attack. Ombudsmen at The Washington Post and elsewhere, this is much more sophisticated than just an average citizen criticizing or making judgement.
 Listener Joe Shaeler (sp?): The public can be like the second wave on a story. You could read a story, say on the economy, and request input. The professional reporters can qualify partisanship out. ... .
@@ Line 235: / Line 237: @@
 Listener -- Bringing the conversation back to citizens not interested in their media. There are multiple news outlets in Minneapolis. To fix this: "Intstead of hiring people as journalists, maybe they should hire people to watch the news media . . . the stories that are important tend to be pushed aside . . . let's pay watchdogs. . . . we've got the Minnesota News Council. Make that a paid position. We need a watchdog for the watchdogs, that's why we're not satisified for the media now."

Bill Densmore at 02:22, 7 June 2008

2008-06-07T02:22:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:22, 7 June 2008
Line 220:		Line 220:

	Griff Wigley -- Would you rather pay for the journalist or for a specific story?		Griff Wigley -- Would you rather pay for the journalist or for a specific story?


			Listener: JonPaul Would you have people pay for access on the Internet, or some sort of tax? Through donations? Tax, an access charge, or donations and wealthy funding. "I'm curious how you guys would work that?"


			Listener: I don't trust the people on the Internet. She has a tendency to believe less she would read on the Internet than what she reads in the paper. She believes more of reporters even though she quit getting the Strib because of its bias. She wants someone sorting out the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, without bias. With the bridge collapse or the girl who said she was kidnapped. "It is the rush to get, we're gonna get, this is the first to get the story and in the end you are all lying . . . the pirahna in Lake Mendotis . . . my daughter watched it and she said you have got to be kidding."


			Michael Caputo: But from these organizations you have trust.


			Michelle: There's an assumption around the circle that there is ''a'' truth. She teachers her students to triangulate around the truth, and the way to do that is to talk to as many sources you can. That takes time and energy. And when organizations are squeezed that get's harder.


			Listener -- Bringing the conversation back to citizens not interested in their media. There are multiple news outlets in Minneapolis. To fix this: "Intstead of hiring people as journalists, maybe they should hire people to watch the news media . . . the stories that are important tend to be pushed aside . . . let's pay watchdogs. . . . we've got the Minnesota News Council. Make that a paid position. We need a watchdog for the watchdogs, that's why we're not satisified for the media now."

Bill Densmore at 02:15, 7 June 2008

2008-06-07T02:15:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:15, 7 June 2008
Line 130:		Line 130:


	Listener:		Listener: Former Minnesota Gov. Jess Ventura said MPR is the only news source that gives every politician a fair shake. He participants in e-Democracy quite a bit. In Minneapolis, there are many places for access to goings on in neighborhoods and communites. "I think the media has to focus more on being the watchdog of the government, because if they don't do it nobody else does."

			Listener: "As a journalist, I look to you to tell me about the things that are outside my normal perview."


			Listener: He worries that if the media spends too much time focused on citizen input, it may be distracted from covering issues of government -- such as learning that the gusset plates are weak (the cause of the Minnesota bridge collapse).


			Listener: Concerned that the public is not happy with the numbers. He believes their need to be public input, but worries about it being too much uninformed input. There are lots of people with journalism degrees getting into this one. He's not afraid that quality of journalism is threatened by proliferation.


			Listener: Linda -- She has worked in law enforcement and works with block groups. One reason she doesn't watch the news is she sees the difference between what took place and what was reported. There is fluff thrown in to make the story exciting. Things aren't reported to the end so people aren't afraid of what they are hearing. They only report the excitement. She's a single parent and works all day. The news she catches is going to work or before bed. Her outlet is the newspaper or TV. She doesn't understand why the Strip won't put the TV guide back into the paper.


			Listener: Michael -- He lives in Apple Valley. Public meetings are generally taped and put on public access. He can compare the archival reports to what the paper wrote and make your own judgement. "We are entering an age and have lived through an age where it is more important than every for citizen to keep the media's feed to the fire." There has been too much cozying up and footsying, and reporters "sucking up to their sources." The press should be the Fourth Estate rather than the fourth arm of the government.


			Michel Caputo: That was the call for the public as critic.


			Michelle Ferrier: The realities are difficult. The newspaper industry is consolidating. Fewer reporters doing more work in a larger field. It's not always a matter of being a lazy journalist but having the time to be informed and do the investigative report we are being asked to do. People got into the business to make a difference -- now they are being asked to do more raather than less. What shoudl the public do: "Helping us in scanning the environment so we know what the issues are . . . what are you feeling and experiencing in your individual lives . . . we're time crunched just like you are."


			Listener: Mark -- He would like to hear about issues before they are decided, so the public still has the ability to influence the debate. Too often they are reported on after the decisions are decided. He appeals for "giving the news the old fashion way like it was when I grew up."


			Listener: Mary Anne Boland -- "I have found maybe in the last 10 years, probably since news organizations started to consolidated ifferent media with TV owned by newspapers and radio stations, that you are getting biased information rather than the news that they are supposed to be reporting. One of the reasons that they put the press in the consitution was that it was supposed to supply us in the public with information we could digest and keep the government healthy."


			Listener: Dick -- "I think one of the things there has been is this capture of the media by capitalism." If the media is going to have to plead with corporate owners to support public radio, or purchasing advertising -- with this consolidation of media outlets -- "I think there is an obvious suspicion with the public that the media is screwing with us because they are owened by." He dislikes that much in the web is anonymous.


			Griff Wigley: In Northfield, there is a growth in the civic capacity of our citizenry. At Locally Grown, will want transparency from the reporter they hire -- they will say, "We want you to be transparent as you work on this story."


			Michael Caputo: Notes that MPR's Bob Collins is a reporter who just blogs -- where he writes a little, the public writes a little, and it goes back and forth.


			Listener Greg: Journalism has improved in the 200 years of the nation. Bias journalism was a problem at the start, as was lack of information for the public. Now he says there are numerous current examples of major stories broken by citizens, by non-journalists. He thinks the public is searching for information. He wishes that when he reads about a story he could be immediately connected to the source information.

			Greg thinks a solution is for quality news organizations should be part of networks that promote and strengthen quality news.


			Listener, Donna: She's trying to come up with ideas that stretch what MPR and other groups are doing. It's key to keep focus on people all across the state. Gusset plate inspectors knew there was a problem. There is a supposedly energy-efficient building in the state is actually an energy hog -- she is the only person who knows that riht now because of her background. She says identify small media sources and highly one of those a day on the radio. She thinks what Griff was saying about citizen tools -- she is not sure media outlets should be used to strengthen citizen engagement. But why not use the same citizen-building tools to build involvement in the media.

			====What about finding what the public wants?====

			Tom Atlee -- He tells the story of McLean's Magazine in Canada. They convened 12 people who represented the diversity of Canada back in 1991. They ended up creating a vision and succeeding through tremendous difficulty. McLean's gave 39 pages to that, and CBC covered it. Three pages of their agreement at the end. "It was a profoundly different and creative kind of journalism." We don't have in our public sphere the idea what would the public come up with if it were asked. "What we have is partisan information and a lot of factual information. We don't have this 'we the people, what would we come up with' kind of information."


			Listener Teller -- It seems there is a presumption that local and national news are exclusive from one another. He'd like to see an increased focus on how national issues are affecting people in local communities. Local news is more accessible to you me and everyone else than national news.


			Steve Clift -- Would love to see news organizations collaborate to create dialog on public issues -- such as graffiti -- that communties are dealing with nationally on the local level. He'd like to see MPR and Strib to collaborate rather than compete with their collaborators and say, "Minnesotans, go online and connect with your neighbors ... really make it so we can breakdown the barriers among people."


			Listener: Elizabeth Tobias -- Suggstions media make public the veritical and lateral relationships among you. "Journalists need to establish relationships not only with me but with each other."


			Michael Caputo: The old mindset is compete for the story.


			Tobais: "YOu are not competing for the story, you are competing for me!"


			Michelle Ferrier: She talked with another placeblogger about becoming sister cities, sharing content and sharing ways to solve problems.


			Listener Jan Fisher -- It used to be that anybody who was reporting had a bias. Watch the American channels report the Olympics vs the CBC or BBC.


			Michael Caputo: There is a school of thought that journalists should just say what their point of view is and lay it out there. Would the public accept that?


			Listener: There is a preconceived idea that there is a bias involved.


			Listener: "The role that I am looking for out of media is one of sorting out all the stuff . . . I need somebody to sort out what happned in that two-hour council meeting that I need to know."


			Listener Greg: Everytime you can give us a way to go to the source, that's a benefit.


			Listener Mike Germain: There is solid fact-based going on in the distributed reproter area -- like the Off the Bus model. Really factbased solid reporting. A couple of the pieces he worked on -- he did a series of 200 interviews across the country. It was sent into the professional journalists. He could see how aspects of his work were incorporated by the professional. There's a lot of fact-based work going on out there. If you use the distributive model you have the journalist all wrapped into one.


			Bill Densmore -- How much would you be willing to pay for quality journalism.


			Griff Wigley -- Would you rather pay for the journalist or for a specific story?

Bill Densmore at 01:33, 7 June 2008

2008-06-07T01:33:30Z

@@ Line 105: / Line 105: @@
 After a five-minute break we now resume with some reformers.
-Bill Densmore of the Media Giraffe Project http://www.mediagiraffe.org/about
+*Bill Densmore of the Media Giraffe Project http://www.mediagiraffe.org/about
-Michelle Ferrier of http://www.MyTopiaCafe.com in Daytona Beach, Fla.  She says MSM has a process which shuts out voices. She talks about media committing "random acts of blindness."
+*Michelle Ferrier of http://www.MyTopiaCafe.com in Daytona Beach, Fla.  She says MSM has a process which shuts out voices. She talks about media committing "random acts of blindness."
-Griff Wigley, of the blog Locally Grown in Northfield, Minn. He talks about the Representative Journalism initiative, to bring a journalist to the table in Northfield. Would the community pay for a journalist? Can put out story ideas, and ask journalists to provide the reporting on a contract basis?
+*Griff Wigley, of the blog Locally Grown in Northfield, Minn. He talks about the Representative Journalism initiative, to bring a journalist to the table in Northfield. Would the community pay for a journalist? Can put out story ideas, and ask journalists to provide the reporting on a contract basis? He hears the listeners really wanting solid journalism.

Bill Densmore at 01:21, 7 June 2008

2008-06-07T01:21:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:21, 7 June 2008
Line 100:		Line 100:

	Listener: Linda Bolandcheller (sp?) Everybody is under the assumption that everybody has cable and Internet and that is not the case. She just got Internt and does not have cable. Her news source is the Star Tribune.		Listener: Linda Bolandcheller (sp?) Everybody is under the assumption that everybody has cable and Internet and that is not the case. She just got Internt and does not have cable. Her news source is the Star Tribune.

			==After a five minute break -- reformers arrive ==

			After a five-minute break we now resume with some reformers.

			Bill Densmore of the Media Giraffe Project http://www.mediagiraffe.org/about

			Michelle Ferrier of http://www.MyTopiaCafe.com in Daytona Beach, Fla. She says MSM has a process which shuts out voices. She talks about media committing "random acts of blindness."

			Griff Wigley, of the blog Locally Grown in Northfield, Minn. He talks about the Representative Journalism initiative, to bring a journalist to the table in Northfield. Would the community pay for a journalist? Can put out story ideas, and ask journalists to provide the reporting on a contract basis?

Bill Densmore at 01:08, 7 June 2008

2008-06-07T01:08:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:08, 7 June 2008
Line 86:		Line 86:


	Listener: He's been listening. What are we talking about to begin with -- the idea that people are fed up with the news they are listening to?		Listener: He's been listening. What are we talking about to begin with -- the idea that people are fed up with the news they are listening to?


			Michael Caputo: The public doesn't think they are getting relevant news. How do we invite the public in? What should the relationship be?


			Listener Mike Germain: The individual needs to take the responsibility to be informed. We need more detailed stories. But the citizen should go ahead and look for other sources. He cites onlinenewspapers.com . . . . "I think we are going in a positive direction. I think that the fact the public is informed enough to be made about the type of news they are getting."


			Listener: Interested in the question of who is the gatekeeper. How do we open the gates and keep the reliability of the news.
			The media needs to be open to many different types and levels of contributions from the public. You can ask for story suggestions in an explicit way. She heard a story where someone from HUD was saying something which she knew from her master's thesis was absolutely false. But nobody asked her opinion.


			Listener: Linda Bolandcheller (sp?) Everybody is under the assumption that everybody has cable and Internet and that is not the case. She just got Internt and does not have cable. Her news source is the Star Tribune.

Bill Densmore at 01:02, 7 June 2008

2008-06-07T01:02:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:02, 7 June 2008
Line 62:		Line 62:

	Listener Mark: Wants to here the news, not some pundit.		Listener Mark: Wants to here the news, not some pundit.


			Listener: Worries about the press having its rights to report stripped from it.


			Listener Greg: "I don't want the news organizations I listen to to relinquish their professional responsibility . . . I want to listen to an organization that doesn't necessarily impost its viewpoint but takes responsibility ... to cover a story in depth, to cover it long . . . I want that."

			Greg has a new idea. He is in medicine. In medicine there are secondary sources -- because you can't keep up with the primary sources. The other tool medicine has -- is checks. He is thinking of FactCheck.org . . . he's pays attention to the Pulitzer prizes. He wants a way to get ranking news by quality.


			Michael Caputo: Who is going to rank my information?


			Greg: "There may be many rankers. And there may be a competition there where things rise to the surface."


			Listener: Christian Annenpour (spelling?) did a three-part series on religious freedom fighters. He likes to watching hour-long investigative series. He'd like to see a public TV channel that rather from 7 p.m. to midnight has perhaps eight one-hour long investigative reports, where he could sit down and be really informed on something.


			Listener: He hopes that the media will accept responsibility to be his most-reliable fact checker. "I want a media that I can turn to that can find out the facts -- nuts and bolts . . . is anybody actually providing the basis of hard-core information rather than opinion."

			Michael Caputo: I will give you 100 facts, 12 inches in my newspaper, I can only put 20 of those facts in there, or only 10 facts in five minutes of air. Even with facts, decisions must be made.


			Listener: He's been listening. What are we talking about to begin with -- the idea that people are fed up with the news they are listening to?

Bill Densmore at 00:56, 7 June 2008

2008-06-07T00:56:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:56, 7 June 2008
Line 36:		Line 36:

	Listener: "It used to be this was a controlled field . . . It's beyond any single person's control now . . . it's about building reputation and quality over time." Yes, everybody is partisan. There's an incredible difference in quality. Because of the skepticism by the public now, if an organization involves the public and is clear and transparent over time, eventually the public will think, "they don't get it right all the time, but I think they usually get it right." You don't pay attention to unreliable blogs.		Listener: "It used to be this was a controlled field . . . It's beyond any single person's control now . . . it's about building reputation and quality over time." Yes, everybody is partisan. There's an incredible difference in quality. Because of the skepticism by the public now, if an organization involves the public and is clear and transparent over time, eventually the public will think, "they don't get it right all the time, but I think they usually get it right." You don't pay attention to unreliable blogs.


			Michael Caputo: Think about what you want that relationship to be like -- public vs. media

			Listener: You have have to consider about how much of an expert you are vs. the material you are reporting or blogging about.


			Listener: Al Hibs (spelling?) -- His concern is with the wider public that isn't sophisticated about understanding how to consume news. "What are they hearing?"


			Listener: When people have the opportunity to correspond in media, "There is the draw to say something just because you have the ability to say something." He thinks as in Public Insight Journalism, you should be qualified for commenting to some extent by your expertise.


			Michael Caputo: How far can we go with the citizen expert when it comes to presenting news?


			Listener: Can't change people's minds about wanting to look at Brittany Spear's navel. He thinks in the future people will tailor the kind of news they want -- and they may enter their point of view as well for filtering the news they receive. "You might be able to filter out the stories you want that give you your point of view ... what can we do to encourage people to want discerning news. Becuase I think its out there but people choose not to use it."


			Listener Mark: He read the statement of the problem. "The problem I actually see is the gatekeepers of the news. I see a lot of good reporting. And then I see the story drop off for the easy story like Anna Nicole Smith." How can you get informed information when the only people the gatekeepers are putting on are political pundits. We need gateskeepers. But if the public doesn't want to come to you becuase you are telling long political stories and they woudl rather tune into entertainment tonight, let them. But still provide the other stuff.


			Michael Caputo: But who is the gatekeeper? "You are."


			Listener Mark: Wants to here the news, not some pundit.

Bill Densmore at 00:49, 7 June 2008

2008-06-07T00:49:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:49, 7 June 2008
Line 28:		Line 28:


	Listener: He grew up on radio.		Listener: He grew up on radio. There are now endless ways for the public to contribute. "The problem is there is such an explosion [of sources] which avenues do you choose?"


			Michael Caputo: The purpose of journalism is to give citizens the tools and information they need to be an active citizen. So what can you trust?

			Listener Jan Fisher: We can talk about the public being critic. But if you read the blogs, they are not only criticizing the professional reporter, they are critcizing each other. With anonymity, you can say anything to anybody. "I think we are in really sad shape . . . we have lost our politeness . . . . "

			Listener: "It used to be this was a controlled field . . . It's beyond any single person's control now . . . it's about building reputation and quality over time." Yes, everybody is partisan. There's an incredible difference in quality. Because of the skepticism by the public now, if an organization involves the public and is clear and transparent over time, eventually the public will think, "they don't get it right all the time, but I think they usually get it right." You don't pay attention to unreliable blogs.