Jtm-dc-reports-afternoon-sharing: Difference between revisions
From Media Giraffe Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Reports from the afternoon-sharing session== | ==Reports from the afternoon-sharing session== | ||
By 2 p.m. on Wednesday, Aug. 8, participants in "Journalism That Matters: The DC Sessions" were ready to offer some key reports and insights after multiple breakout sessions and group discussions. (34 min.; 15.6MB) | |||
( | [http://newshare.typepad.com/jtm2007/2007/08/audio-end-of-ev.html LINK TO AFTERNOON-SHARING AUDIO STREAM OR DOWNLOAD] (34 MIN.; 15.6MB) | ||
A few excerpts reports from afternoon sharing: | |||
*Len Witt: Reach out to people on the ground and find out what they know and don't know. It's a paradigm change. | *Len Witt: Reach out to people on the ground and find out what they know and don't know. It's a paradigm change. | ||
*Victor of Univ. of Ill. and | *Victor of Univ. of Ill. and Free Press. | ||
*Several sessions on media policy. A recurring theme was ignoring Internet policy is perilous. If journalism will have at least a net component,then have to engaged with network neutrality and other things. There also might be a role for policy to subsidize these models and create new revenue streams. There may be other ways to get local government involved. | *Several sessions on media policy. A recurring theme was ignoring Internet policy is perilous. If journalism will have at least a net component,then have to engaged with network neutrality and other things. There also might be a role for policy to subsidize these models and create new revenue streams. There may be other ways to get local government involved. | ||
*Jim Shaffer: Is journalism broken or is the vessel broken? it is a question of one-to-one journalism and many-to-one journalism. Aren't values the same regardless of the vehicle | *Jim Shaffer: Is journalism broken or is the vessel broken? it is a question of one-to-one journalism and many-to-one journalism. Aren't values the same regardless of the vehicle? Shaffer is concluding the values should change as we move to many-to-many -- that implies a different covenant. | ||
[[Category:JTM-DC reports]] | [[Category:JTM-DC reports]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:59, 9 September 2007
Reports from the afternoon-sharing session
By 2 p.m. on Wednesday, Aug. 8, participants in "Journalism That Matters: The DC Sessions" were ready to offer some key reports and insights after multiple breakout sessions and group discussions. (34 min.; 15.6MB)
LINK TO AFTERNOON-SHARING AUDIO STREAM OR DOWNLOAD (34 MIN.; 15.6MB)
A few excerpts reports from afternoon sharing:
- Len Witt: Reach out to people on the ground and find out what they know and don't know. It's a paradigm change.
- Victor of Univ. of Ill. and Free Press.
- Several sessions on media policy. A recurring theme was ignoring Internet policy is perilous. If journalism will have at least a net component,then have to engaged with network neutrality and other things. There also might be a role for policy to subsidize these models and create new revenue streams. There may be other ways to get local government involved.
- Jim Shaffer: Is journalism broken or is the vessel broken? it is a question of one-to-one journalism and many-to-one journalism. Aren't values the same regardless of the vehicle? Shaffer is concluding the values should change as we move to many-to-many -- that implies a different covenant.
